Re: Adaptec Vs. BusLogic Fast/Wide adapters...

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

Article #327

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Previous Next

#327

From: Brian Case
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 04:45

13 lines
973 bytes

Brian Case wrote:
> ...When I tried a Quantum 2GB Atlas (uh,
> 32150W), the buslogic pulled ahead, and by a large margin
> in some tests. ...

Followup to my own followup,

It seems there was one anomalous test result that led to the
above conclusion about the 956C vs. NCR-based board that I
have. I can no longer duplicate the case where the 965C is
dramatically faster than the NCR-based board.

bcase

Technical Details

Message-ID: <31280078.432B@best.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!shellx.best.com!usenet

References: <4g1qpd$5gs@steel.interlog.com> <31258F00.70F0@best.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!shellx.best.com!usenet
From: Brian Case <bcase@best.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: Adaptec Vs. BusLogic  Fast/Wide adapters...
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 20:45:44 -0800
Organization: Best Internet Communications
Message-ID: <31280078.432B@best.com>
References: <4g1qpd$5gs@steel.interlog.com> <31258F00.70F0@best.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcase.vip.best.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I)

Reply to Parent Message