Re: Time for Voodoo 2?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video

Article #342

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video Previous Next

#342

From: Wael Hendawi
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 00:00

14 lines
1089 bytes

> for a card to go 800 X 600 means shit for image quality. Wait for the
> next generation cards (G200, PVRSG, TNT and Savage3D).

 I disagree with you here , I see a difference in image quality
between my 640x480 Voodoo1 and my friends 800x600 Voodoo2.

Also what good a card that can run 2048x2048 with 1fps.


--
Wael Hendawi, Software Engineer

Sagantec Israel, Sagantec North America Inc. http://www.sagantec.co.il/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <356BF423.2BD21AE2@sagantec.co.il>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <brianbetEtLnLu.L60@netcom.com> <356BD32C.47DB@nospam.ibm.net> <356BE25F.D415935C@home.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,e7b881622e782a47
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a47c,e7b881622e782a47
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a47c,public
From: Wael Hendawi <wael@sagantec.co.il>
Subject: Re: Time for Voodoo 2?
Date: 1998/05/27
Message-ID: <356BF423.2BD21AE2@sagantec.co.il>
X-Deja-AN: 356950551
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <brianbetEtLnLu.L60@netcom.com> <356BD32C.47DB@nospam.ibm.net> <356BE25F.D415935C@home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NetVision LTD.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products

Reply to Parent Message