Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #343Re: Time for Voodoo 2?
From: David
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 00:00
25 lines
1694 bytes
1694 bytes
On Wed, 27 May 1998 05:08:18 GMT, brianbet@netcom.com (Brian Bethel) wrote: >Hey, all. Have a question I'm sure you brilliant Netizens can help me with. > >I just bought a new Pentium II 266. Yeah, yeah, I know ... your Pentium >400 kicks the snot out of it. It's still a lot cooler than what I had, >and it was pretty cheap, too. > >I have in my old machine an original Monster 3D. My first impulse was to >just transfer the card, but I'm starting to wonder if that's the most >proper thing to do. > >How much of a real-world performance jump would I see if I bought, say, >one of the upcoming Canopus cards or a Monster II with 12mb? If the >perfomance hike is extreme enough, I may cough up the cash. > >Is the image quality any better on current software? Inquiring minds want >to know. :) A voodoo2 is about 2 - 3 times faster at quake/quake2 on a 266. I had a voodoo1, quake2 (untweaked) gave about 22fps, the voodoo2 gives about 54fps on demo1. It generally feels a lot smoother, if you can afford it, then go for it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<357003c4.11626363@news.strath.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<brianbetEtLnLu.L60@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a47c,e7b881622e782a47 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a47c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,e7b881622e782a47 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: d.templeton@nospam.eee.strath.ac.uk (David) Subject: Re: Time for Voodoo 2? Date: 1998/05/27 Message-ID: <357003c4.11626363@news.strath.ac.uk> X-Deja-AN: 356956434 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <brianbetEtLnLu.L60@netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: University of Strathclyde Computer Centre Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products