Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #467Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither?
From: Andrew Pann
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00
28 lines
2374 bytes
2374 bytes
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999 13:56:04 -0400, "Thomas Schamer" <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >They worked for me, I guess it's just personal opinion. The review given to the TNT2 seems pretty favorable, and the performance results they put up seem to indicate that V3 and TNT2 performance is pretty comparable, give or take a few FPS depending on the circumstances. So to say that reading the post should shut up anyone who thinks the TNT2 is faster than the V3 is probably reasonable, but as evidence for saying that nVidia's products suck...is not. Andrew >JvG <jeanvg@nospam.dds.nl> wrote in message >news:w_0O2.891$EM4.2473@amsnews... >> In article, "Thomas Schamer" <t.schamer@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >> >> >I know, it isn't their drivers that suck, it's their products. ( If >anyone >> >still thinks the TNT-2 is faster than the V3, check out Riva3D's new >> >reviews- they'll shut you up.) >> >> They didn't, sorry. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<370938f9.795640@netnews.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <Q0tN2.639$EM4.2433@amsnews> <7e93m6$m36$2@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <w_0O2.891$EM4.2473@amsnews> <7eau0o$1i5$2@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,3bf2e229bc16fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,3bf2e229bc16fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: ajp3@worldnet.att.net (Andrew Pann) Subject: Re: TNT2 or Voodoo3 or neither? Date: 1999/04/05 Message-ID: <370938f9.795640@netnews.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 463023700 References: <36F9D174.626A9661@NOSPAMhome.com> <7dcrl9$6c1$1@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <52F6ECA1A90D5450.1A1EA646BC48AB1D.E55D8869CC4050E0@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7de5eh$618$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <9E52D478FF2E9A84.BD5BBDA8BB69250D.99A93CFEA9E23551@library-proxy.airnews.net> <7df5c7$p5p$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <w8eL2.43$04.77@stones> <36fe5750.378438@news.thezone.net> <IDcN2.26600$Ll.3441@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <37056ea4.11213424@news.thezone.net> <M1lN2.27290$Ll.3184@nntp0.detroit.mi.ameritech.net> <M_nN2.3945$LM.7798@news.rdc1.mi.home.com> <370640a5.2827475@news.thezone.net> <Q0tN2.639$EM4.2433@amsnews> <7e93m6$m36$2@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <w_0O2.891$EM4.2473@amsnews> <7eau0o$1i5$2@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net 923351439 16527 12.75.130.67 (5 Apr 1999 22:30:39 GMT) Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Apr 1999 22:30:39 GMT Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2