Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Article #694Re: TNT & Socket 7 K6-2 combo runs like crap! -- would V2 really be better? (was: Are there ANY games that use 3DNow *fully* bes...
From: Lane Todd Denson
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00
66 lines
4210 bytes
4210 bytes
A single v2 is not significantly better than the TNT, and if you plan to get a celeron300a/Abit BX combo soon, stick with the TNT (what are you waiting for? You can get both for under $200) joe <dreamlogic@nixspamsprintmail.com> wrote in message news:367fc0e8.1406563@news.earthlink.net... >Alas, this is the ONE time I did not take everyone's advice on Usenet >and now I'm suffering for it. So you think the V2 & or/Banshee will >DEFINITELY give me noticeably smoother gameplay with the current crop >of first person shooters? All I want is to be able to play these >games at their best image quality settings with respectable framerates >(25 -- 30 FPS), that is 800 X 600, 16-bit color & medium to high >detail settings. However, am I being unrealistic here & is this even >possible with a TX-based chipset motherboard, K6-2 300 MHz cpu & a >Voodoo 2 3D accelerator? Fortunately, I purchased the TNT card at >CompUSA & have recourse with their liberal return policy. But would >it really be worth it to swap the TNT for the V2 or Banshee? Don't >wanna be driving 50 miles out to CompUSA again to return the >V2/Banshee if it performs no better or only slightly better than the >TNT on my system. I can't even begin to tell you how disappointed I >am with the TNT/K6-2 combo. I mean, My old S220 Stealth II actually >played Blood 2 smoother than the STB Velocity 4400 at the same lower >resolution (640 X 480) & detail settings for God's sake!!!! Thanks >for responding. > >best, >joe > >On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 09:48:31 -0500, "Rob Fullerton" ><robsNOSPAMtv@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >>The problem lies more in your choice of video card, not the system it is in. >>If you had chosen a V2 instead of the TNT, you probably wouldn't be posting >>any complaints. >> >>The Shuttle 569 is not a super socket 7, and the TNT would be easily beaten >>by a Voodoo2 in this system. Add to that the fact that 3DNow! is much better >>optimized for the V2. >> >>I have 2 systems running Hot 569's, K6-2 300 (at 375mhz), and Voodoo2's and >>they do scream in all of these games. This combo runs games faster than >>friends overclocked Celeron 300 and Spectra TNT card. If you are planning on >>sticking with a TNT, then when you upgrade, don't settle for less than an >>upper end P2, or you'll still be disappointed. > >>joe wrote in message <368010a4.22105567@news.earthlink.net>... > >>>Just bought a TNT card for my old standard Socket 7 Shuttle >>>HOT-569/K6-2 266 MHz (O/C to 300 MHz) combo & was very displeased to >>>see that games like Shogo & Blood 2 run like shit through a funnel on >>>it at 800 X 600. Are there any games besides Q2 that fully take >>>advantage of 3DNow? I can't believe that with so many under $1000 >>>K6-2-based systems being sold there isn't better 3DNow support. Until >>>I can afford to get a Celeron 300A & LX motherboard I'm stuck with >>>this rather disappointing K6-2 cpu and it's poor FPU performance so I >>>need all the help I can get in the way of hardware/software >>>acceleration. > >remove nixspam to reply via email >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0lTf2.2635$vI5.514@news.rdc1.tn.home.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<368010a4.22105567@news.earthlink.net> <75ob35$2e6i$1@news.gate.net> <367fc0e8.1406563@news.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108f8e,32e6a823c4cc0c95 X-Google-Attributes: gid108f8e,public X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,32e6a823c4cc0c95 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,32e6a823c4cc0c95 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public From: "Lane Todd Denson" <laner@bigfoot.com> Subject: Re: TNT & Socket 7 K6-2 combo runs like crap! -- would V2 really be better? (was: Are there ANY games that use 3DNow *fully* besides Q2?) Date: 1998/12/22 Message-ID: <0lTf2.2635$vI5.514@news.rdc1.tn.home.com> X-Deja-AN: 424947804 References: <368010a4.22105567@news.earthlink.net> <75ob35$2e6i$1@news.gate.net> <367fc0e8.1406563@news.earthlink.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news.rdc1.tn.home.com 914358716 24.2.104.97 (Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:31:56 PDT) Organization: @Home Network X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:31:56 PDT Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,3dfx.products.voodoo2,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action