Re: RAW PARTITION in UNIFY under AIX (HELP!!!!)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt

Article #101

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Previous Next

#101

From: Uri Blumenthal
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 16:04

15 lines
1111 bytes

From article <2692@cveg.uucp>, by f0057@uafhp.uucp (James E. Ward):
> 
> Just how bad is AIX?  My IBM rep is pushing it (we are planning to by an RT) of
> course, but is it REALLY bad?  Should we get AOS instead?  Any comments or help
> would be much appreciated.

I'm not sure if I should speak up (I work for IBM) - but I think AIX is
OK. I work with it on RT, and so far haven't got any troubles yet (:-).
More or less convenient, rather less buggy, performance - OK. Compatible
with Sys.V.2, some compatibility with V.3.0, compatible with BSD...
Well, what info do YOU need actually? Is it working? Yes, of course! That's
what I'm keying this answer on. Is it the best UNIX? Who the hell knows...
Not the worst, I bet...
       
Uri.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <211@arnor.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!arnor!uri

References: <2692@cveg.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!arnor!uri
From: uri@arnor.UUCP (Uri Blumenthal)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Subject: Re: RAW PARTITION in UNIFY under AIX (HELP!!!!)
Message-ID: <211@arnor.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jul 89 16:04:32 GMT
References: <2692@cveg.uucp>
Organization: IBM Corp., Yorktown NY
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message