Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Article #102Re: RAW PARTITION in UNIFY under AIX (HELP!!!!)
From: Pete Gregory
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 21:08
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 21:08
24 lines
1699 bytes
1699 bytes
In article <2692@cveg.uucp>, f0057@uafhp.uucp (James E. Ward) writes: > > In article <138@bally.Bally.COM>, pete@bally.Bally.COM (Pete Gregory) writes: > > We are IBM RT model 135 owners, using AIX 2.2.1 (no condolences please!). > > > > pete@bally.COM (bally.UUCP) :: ________ > > Just how bad is AIX? My IBM rep is pushing it (we are planning to by an RT) of > course, but is it REALLY bad? Should we get AOS instead? Any comments or help > would be much appreciated. We have been using AIX for more than two years now, and have found it to be EXTREMELY RELIABLE. Our systems (and our customers' systems) run for weeks and months at a time without the need to reboot. Some of our programmers here have experience with BSD UNIX, and say that AIX is far better. I apologize to all who got the idea that we are having trouble with AIX. On the contrary, we are merely in need of some help from someone who has gotten raw-mode working in Unify DBMS. Anyone?... pete@bally.COM (bally.UUCP) :: ________ Bally Systems :: |\ / \ "My boss 255 Bell St., Reno, NV :: | X IXOYE ) is a (702) 323-6156 x882 :: |/ \ ________ / carpenter."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<142@bally.Bally.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bally!peteReferences:
<138@bally.Bally.COM> <2692@cveg.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bally!pete From: pete@bally.Bally.COM (Pete Gregory) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: RAW PARTITION in UNIFY under AIX (HELP!!!!) Keywords: aix, rt, ibm, osf, aos Message-ID: <142@bally.Bally.COM> Date: 5 Jul 89 21:08:34 GMT References: <138@bally.Bally.COM> <2692@cveg.uucp> Organization: Bally Systems, Reno, NV Lines: 24