Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Article #423Re: curious
From: John F. Haugh II
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1989 06:10
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1989 06:10
26 lines
1670 bytes
1670 bytes
In article <27415@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> royle@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (keenan royle) writes:
>I am curious, is there anyone out there who has used RTs running AIX as a
>developement and/or production platform and is pleased.
>
>I used them for more than a year and hate the things.
I prefer my RT over the last large machine [ Plexus P/95 ] I had
available to do development on.
There are a few things I'd -like- to have. Like three 310MB
internal EESDIs instead of the #$*^%&@ 440MB SCSI I've had so
much trouble with lately. Three E70s and a 9332/440 do not
cut it.
RTs come in a variety of shapes and sizes. I could imagine
being quite disgusted with a ROMP desktop, 4MB, and a M44.
On the other hand, a 135, 3 E310s, a megapel, and 16MB fast
ram would keep me [ and xfish ;-) ] happy for a long, long time.
Getting the right CPU is a big factor. ROMPs all need to be
heaved. Next is LOTS of RAM and several big, fast disks.
--
John F. Haugh II +-Things you didn't want to know:------
VoiceNet: (512) 832-8832 Data: -8835 | The real meaning of MACH is ...
InterNet: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org | ... Messages Are Crufty Hacks.
UUCPNet: {texbell|bigtex}!rpp386!jfh +--------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<17120@rpp386.cactus.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!texbell!sequoia!rpp386!jfhReferences:
<27415@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!texbell!sequoia!rpp386!jfh From: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: curious Message-ID: <17120@rpp386.cactus.org> Date: 10 Oct 89 06:10:06 GMT References: <27415@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) Organization: TrishTrash Readers, Inc. Lines: 26