Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Article #424Re: curious
From: Bill Kennedy
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1989 12:10
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1989 12:10
23 lines
1605 bytes
1605 bytes
In article <27415@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> royle@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (keenan royle) writes:
>
>I am curious, is there anyone out there who has used RTs running AIX as a
>developement and/or production platform and is pleased.
>
>I used them for more than a year and hate the things.
Depending on the flavor (processor) you have, the RT is a very capable
development machine. I used a ROMP for a while and was completely
underwhelmed. Adding some memory helped, but relative to a 16MHz 80386,
it was pretty pokey. An APC-125 upgrade made it quite acceptable with
the same work mix, but it ran into loading problems when I piled a heavy
duty load on it.
The ideal development system for a truly "industrial strength" load is
an APC-135. On paper it's only 25% faster than a 125, but for a long
series of compiles and links it's better than twice as fast. I can
get through a huge make in about seven hours that takes twelve on the
aforementioned 16MHz 80386. Since there was no mention of $$$ comparison,
I'll leave it at that :-)
--
Bill Kennedy {texbell,att,cs.utexas.edu,sun!daver}!ssbn!bill
bill@ssbn.WLK.COM or attmail!ssbn!bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<433@inebriae.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!texbell!ssbn!inebriae!billReferences:
<27415@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!texbell!ssbn!inebriae!bill From: bill@inebriae.UUCP (Bill Kennedy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: curious Message-ID: <433@inebriae.UUCP> Date: 10 Oct 89 12:10:52 GMT References: <27415@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Reply-To: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) Distribution: na Organization: W.L. Kennedy Jr. and Associates, Pipe Creek, TX Lines: 23