Re: Conflict between 386MAX and FASTOPEN? (and which EMM is best)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #43944

#43944

From: Tom Almy
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 1990 16:38

15 lines
993 bytes

In article <1990Mar9.223031.4873@cs.dal.ca> lane@cs.dal.ca.UUCP (John Wright/Dr. Pat Lane) writes:
>I wonder if either QEMM or 386PRO can "loadhi" programs installed with
>INSTALL= in the CONFIG.SYS.  Would be useful for SHARE.EXE.

With 386PRO:

1. Put share.exe in a directory where DOS can't find it (so it won't load it
   automatically).

2. Put in your autoexec.bat:
     386load size=13576 prog=pathname\share.exe

Tom Almy
toma@tekgvs.labs.tek.com
Standard Disclaimers Apply

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7082@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!toma

References: <1990Mar9.223031.4873@cs.dal.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!toma
From: toma@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Conflict between 386MAX and FASTOPEN? (and which EMM is best)
Keywords: EMS QEMM 386MAX DOS4 FASTOPEN
Message-ID: <7082@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 12 Mar 90 16:38:37 GMT
References: <1990Mar9.223031.4873@cs.dal.ca>
Reply-To: toma@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy)
Distribution: na
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message