🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1197

Re: 486 vs. Mac Benchmarks

#1197
From: Mark Eaton
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 19:59
74 lines
3464 bytes
In article <BzAD75.Fzq@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib) writes:
 
>
>In article <Bz2C4s.FqE@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov26.000926.9507@doug.cae.wisc.edu> jimy@cae.wisc.edu (Jim Yu) writes:
>>Hardware: IBM PS/2 Model 56Slc (386SLC, not sure about MHz)., ATI 8514/
>>          Ultra video, 1024x768x 256 colors (running 8514 driver). 12
>>          Meg. RAM.
>>
>>          Macintosh IICi, built-in Apple video, 680x480(yuck)x256 colors.
>>          32 bit addressing turned on, VRAM on, 16 Meg available, disk
>>          cache 384K.
>>
>>          In the wings (have to try this later): Clone 386-40, 4 Meg RAM,
>>          Diamond Speedstar 800x600x256 color video.
>>
>>Software: Excel 3 (I will try it with Excel 4 in the next couple days).
>>
>>The test: Put an integer into cell A1. Cells B1 -> Z1 are cell to the left
>>          + 1. Cells A2 -> Z1000 are cell above +1. See how long it takes
>>          to recalc the sheet after changing value of A1.
>>
>>Results:  Under Windows recalc took 3.3 seconds. On the Mac, 7.5 seconds.
>
>Another data point:
>
>AMD 386-40, 4 Meg RAM. Excel 4. 2.2 - 2.3 seconds.
>
>(On an Amiga 2000 - machine locked up copying 100 cells 9-) )
>
>Next thing to try:
>
>Excel 4 on Si.
>Excel 4 on Ci.
>Excel 4 on PS/2 Model 70 (20 MHz 386)
>1234W on PS/2 Model 70.
>Excel 4 on Gateway 486/33
>1234W on Gateway 486/33
>
>What I'd like others to try (I don't have the hardware/software):
>
>Quadra 700/900
>WingZ for Windows and Mac
>123 4 Mac on various Macs.
>
I did the benchmark on my IIsi with % meg RAM and an FPU using
123 v.1.0 ---> a whopping 16 seconds! 123 kept complaining about
low mem, and I do have a lot of extensions running. I can't
explain such poor performance tho... shrug
 
>Haven't devised it yet but some silly trig-based floating point
>spreadsheet. This should show a big 486 vs. 386 (no 387) speedup.
>
>Some kind of equally silly wordprocessing task on all the platforms.
>
>
>By the way the scrolling in Excel while I was doing this was pretty
>fast (Diamond Speedstar card). Not as fast as Lotus 2.0 under DOS
>on the same machine but who cares?
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
>Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
>Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark Eaton                    | Opinions? We're not allowed to have
UC525655@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU | opinions at Mizzou... get back to me
                              | in '94 when I graduate... ;)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <168BEC4B4.UC525655@mizzou1.missouri.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!ukma!mont!mizzou1.missouri.edu!UC525655
References: <1992Nov25.130250.10922@utkux1.utk.edu> <1992Nov26.000926.9507@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <Bz2C4s.FqE@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <BzAD75.Fzq@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!ukma!mont!mizzou1.missouri.edu!UC525655
From: UC525655@mizzou1.missouri.edu (Mark Eaton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 486 vs. Mac Benchmarks
Message-ID: <168BEC4B4.UC525655@mizzou1.missouri.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 92 19:59:10 GMT
References: <1992Nov25.130250.10922@utkux1.utk.edu> <1992Nov26.000926.9507@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <Bz2C4s.FqE@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <BzAD75.Fzq@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
Organization: University of Missouri
Lines: 74
Nntp-Posting-Host: mizzou1.missouri.edu