🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1280

Re: i860 vs. i960

#1280
From: Guy Harris
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:23
16 lines
1143 bytes
>i960 .... These are intended for "embedded computing"
>applications, like Postscript interpretation, smart bridges/routers,
>and avionics.

Well, they are *now*.

Somebody from Intel once indicated that the i960 was *originally*
intended to be *the* 32-bit microprocessor architecture from Intel, for
everything from toasters through UNIX boxes to BiiN boxes. 
(Unfortunately, I guess the 386 came along too soon, or the first 960
came out too late....)

From e.g. statements in Myers and Budde's book on the 960 architecture,
I can easily believe that was the case.  Was it?  (No spin-doctoring,
please; if it was the case, but Intel doesn't want you to say it was the
case, just don't say anything.)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <15547@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy
References: <1992Nov17.233954.2581@cs.ucla.edu> <DOCONNOR.92Nov18081027@potato.sedona.intel.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: i860 vs. i960
Message-ID: <15547@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:23:09 GMT
References: <1992Nov17.233954.2581@cs.ucla.edu> <DOCONNOR.92Nov18081027@potato.sedona.intel.com>
Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 16
Nntp-Posting-Host: bootme.auspex.com