Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1280Re: i860 vs. i960
From: Guy Harris
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:23
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:23
16 lines
1143 bytes
1143 bytes
>i960 .... These are intended for "embedded computing" >applications, like Postscript interpretation, smart bridges/routers, >and avionics. Well, they are *now*. Somebody from Intel once indicated that the i960 was *originally* intended to be *the* 32-bit microprocessor architecture from Intel, for everything from toasters through UNIX boxes to BiiN boxes. (Unfortunately, I guess the 386 came along too soon, or the first 960 came out too late....) From e.g. statements in Myers and Budde's book on the 960 architecture, I can easily believe that was the case. Was it? (No spin-doctoring, please; if it was the case, but Intel doesn't want you to say it was the case, just don't say anything.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15547@auspex-gw.auspex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guyReferences:
<1992Nov17.233954.2581@cs.ucla.edu> <DOCONNOR.92Nov18081027@potato.sedona.intel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: i860 vs. i960 Message-ID: <15547@auspex-gw.auspex.com> Date: 18 Nov 92 19:23:09 GMT References: <1992Nov17.233954.2581@cs.ucla.edu> <DOCONNOR.92Nov18081027@potato.sedona.intel.com> Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara Lines: 16 Nntp-Posting-Host: bootme.auspex.com