Why not INTEL586?

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #14

#14

From: Tan Jin Meng
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 10:33

5 lines
508 bytes

I can understand why INTEL would want a name for their next generation
processor to be trademarkable. Then why not simply use the name
INTEL586. Surely this has to be trademarkable.

jin meng

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct28.103344.18434@nuscc.nus.sg>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!nuscc!eletanjm

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!nuscc!eletanjm
From: eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (Tan Jin Meng)
Subject: Why not INTEL586?
Message-ID: <1992Oct28.103344.18434@nuscc.nus.sg>
Organization: National University of Singapore
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 10:33:44 GMT
Lines: 5