Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1430Re: Pentium to be Scrapped?!
From: Dennis O'Connor
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 23:35
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 23:35
18 lines
1394 bytes
1394 bytes
tdbear@dvorak.amd.com (Thomas D. Barrett) writes: ] In article <DOCONNOR.93Jan7094831@potato.sedona.intel.com> doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) writes: ] >This is an idiotic rumor. No part in the 960 architecture will EVER ] >replace the x86 line. Where did you hear such lunacy ? ] ] There was talk about a year ago that the MP# pin wouldn't be static in ] a 960-like part which would allow a 486 to co-exist with this part ] which installed in the OverDrive(tm) socket. Well, I don't hear everything that's said everywhere, but I do work in the i960(tm) processor Architecture group here at Intel, and I never heard anyone plan to do anything of the kind. I won't, however, comment on what we do plan to do. That's not my job. -- Dennis O'Connor doconnor@sedona.intel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DOCONNOR.93Jan8233531@potato.sedona.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnorReferences:
<1993Jan6.235812.18764@netcom.com> <DOCONNOR.93Jan7094831@potato.sedona.intel.com> <1993Jan8.192720.20393@dvorak.amd.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnor From: doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Pentium to be Scrapped?! Date: 8 Jan 93 23:35:31 Organization: Intel i960(tm) Architecture Lines: 18 Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.93Jan8233531@potato.sedona.intel.com> References: <1993Jan6.235812.18764@netcom.com> <DOCONNOR.93Jan7094831@potato.sedona.intel.com> <1993Jan8.192720.20393@dvorak.amd.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: potato.intel.com In-reply-to: tdbear@dvorak.amd.com's message of Fri, 8 Jan 93 19:27:20 GMT