Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1832Re: 80486
From: Tim Beres
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1988 16:51
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1988 16:51
24 lines
1648 bytes
1648 bytes
In article <17566@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU> ocyy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu () writes:
>
>I hope that I am posting to the best group. I recently heard that the 486 chip
>is headed for the real world. Can anyone forward a summary of info or just
>here? What are the major differences with the 386? What likely cost increase
>will there be or is this ultimately destined to be a PC CPU? How many years
>before production runs are on line?
My info is from InfoWorld: The major difference is that the 486 will be
a "set" of closely coupled chips, similar to the 386/cache/DMA set, but
with higher levels of integration and (presumably) more features.
Other stuff I've heard: 486 will include on-chip (pick one or more) FP,
graphics, high speed I/O; the 486 will be RISC architected; first
silicon will achieve 2X performance increase over top of line 386;
you will see 486 machines on the market in 89.
Of course I could be wrong.
Tim
------>MY SOAPBOX (I speak not for Cadnetix nor any enjoined entity)
OK, one more time: This is a frying pan.....this is an egg....
this is an egg in a frying pan....JUST SAY OVER EASY
Tim Beres beres@cadnetix.com {uunet,boulder,nbires}!cadnetix!beres
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5800@cadnetix.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cadnetix.COM!cadnetix!beresReferences:
<17566@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cadnetix.COM!cadnetix!beres From: beres@cadnetix.COM (Tim Beres) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: 80486 Keywords: 486 request for info Message-ID: <5800@cadnetix.COM> Date: 16 Dec 88 16:51:00 GMT References: <17566@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU> Sender: news@cadnetix.COM Reply-To: beres@cadnetix.COM (Tim Beres) Distribution: comp Organization: Cadnetix Corp., Boulder, CO Lines: 24