Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #33Re: SRAM vs DRAM (was: how better 60ns DRAM over 70ns)
From: Tobin M. Creek
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 13:48
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 13:48
33 lines
2272 bytes
2272 bytes
In article <1992Oct30.041806.3484@ksmith.uucp>, keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith) writes:
>
>In article <68457@cup.portal.com> drchip@cup.portal.com (MYRON A LIEBERMAN) writes:
>>15ns DRAMs
>>
>>Where do you propose to obtain 15ns DRAMs? Until recently the fastest made
>>was a 53ns DRAM manufactured by NMB Semiconductor. Last year several
>>companies have announced the development of 40ns DRAMs, but that would
>>appear to be the fastest. While 15ns SRAM is readily available, the need
>>for refresh makes DRAMs more challenging to produce at low access times.
>
>Speaking of which. My first computer used SRAM because it was easy to
>implement, and inherently faster (no refresh). My question is why no
>one makes a Generic 386/486 that doesn't USE dram at all, but only SRAM.
>How come we don't have SRAM SIMM? You should be able to buy SRAM at
>about 4 times the cost of DRAM. That means you could get a dramatic
>performance boost for the expense of some extra money in RAM. <sigh>.
>--
>Keith Smith uunet!ksmith!keith 5719 Archer Rd.
>Digital Designs BBS 1-919-423-4216 Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201
>Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
>
I remember a review of a Compuadd machine in a PC Magazine once, where it had
two megs of all SRAMS (don't remember speed). It was a touch faster than the
others, but didn't really justify the higher price.
P.S. I'm from Fayetteville! Wanna play the name game?
Send replies to: | My opinions do not represent
tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu | anyone who does not feel the
creek-tm@aza.csc.ncsu.edu | same way as I do.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct30.134823.5684@ncsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!taco!tmcreekReferences:
<1992Oct20.190045.2441@rz.uni-jena.de> <jpyp5vm@lynx.unm.edu> <68457@cup.portal.com> <1992Oct30.041806.3484@ksmith.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,to.rde Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!taco!tmcreek From: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu (Tobin M. Creek) Subject: Re: SRAM vs DRAM (was: how better 60ns DRAM over 70ns) Message-ID: <1992Oct30.134823.5684@ncsu.edu> Originator: tmcreek@pepe.csc.ncsu.edu Lines: 33 Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu (Tobin M. Creek) Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos References: <1992Oct20.190045.2441@rz.uni-jena.de> <jpyp5vm@lynx.unm.edu> <68457@cup.portal.com> <1992Oct30.041806.3484@ksmith.uucp> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 13:48:23 GMT