Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #59Re: Why not INTEL586?
From: Harald Milz
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 08:14
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 08:14
21 lines
1254 bytes
1254 bytes
In article <1992Oct29.141019.18826@fct.unl.pt>, jpl@tche.fct.unl.pt (Joao Prospero Luis [ps]) writes: |> Tan Jin Meng (eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg) wrote: |> : I can understand why INTEL would want a name for their next generation |> : processor to be trademarkable. Then why not simply use the name |> : INTEL586. Surely this has to be trademarkable. |> : |> : jin meng |> |> Because AMD (for example) would then sell AMD586 or something like that. |> If you use a number in a name somebody else can replace whatever letters |> you use and keep the number. |> I'll bet my ass they'll do. -- |Dipl.-Ing. Harald Milz | EMail: hm@ix.de | |iX - Multiuser Multitasking Magazin | FAX: +49 511 547 47 33 | |D-3000 Hannover 61, Helstorfer Str. 7 | Tel.: +49 511 547 47 66 |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov2.081433.14831@opus40.ix.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rz.uni-hildesheim.de!ix.de!hmReferences:
<1992Oct28.103344.18434@nuscc.nus.sg> <1992Oct29.141019.18826@fct.unl.pt>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rz.uni-hildesheim.de!ix.de!hm From: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz) Subject: Re: Why not INTEL586? Message-ID: <1992Nov2.081433.14831@opus40.ix.de> Sender: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz) Organization: iX-Redaktion References: <1992Oct28.103344.18434@nuscc.nus.sg> <1992Oct29.141019.18826@fct.unl.pt> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 08:14:33 GMT Lines: 21