Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #60Re: why not i586
From: Harald Milz
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 08:19
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 08:19
19 lines
1330 bytes
1330 bytes
In article <1992Oct30.185605.8480@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com>, walls@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Gerald Walls) writes: |> In article <1992Oct29.181700.7121@ichips.intel.com> rminemie@sedona.intel.com (Ronald Minemier) writes: |> >i586 and intel586 are names that could be trademarked. one of the issues |> >is that some other company can also tradmark a name like xxx586xxx |> > |> >this could be a problem to customers because the two parts may not |> >actually be the same thing...close but not the same...most companies |> >like their customers to get exactly what they already think they are |> >getting. |> |> like the 486SX and 487SX? Beat'em! -- |Dipl.-Ing. Harald Milz | EMail: hm@ix.de | |iX - Multiuser Multitasking Magazin | FAX: +49 511 547 47 33 | |D-3000 Hannover 61, Helstorfer Str. 7 | Tel.: +49 511 547 47 66 |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov2.081919.14898@opus40.ix.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rz.uni-hildesheim.de!ix.de!hmReferences:
<1992Oct29.181700.7121@ichips.intel.com> <1992Oct30.185605.8480@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rz.uni-hildesheim.de!ix.de!hm From: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz) Subject: Re: why not i586 Message-ID: <1992Nov2.081919.14898@opus40.ix.de> Sender: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz) Organization: iX-Redaktion References: <1992Oct29.181700.7121@ichips.intel.com> <1992Oct30.185605.8480@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 08:19:19 GMT Lines: 19