Re: LOADALL and the 486

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #881

#881

From: Alan Rooks
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 18:33

12 lines
868 bytes

marcusj@apricot.co.uk (Marcus Jenkins) writes:
>I know this may be an FAQ, but I am just a little confused.  Is
>LOADALL implemented in the 486?

[more stuff about LOADALL, asks for email answers]

FAQ or no, could someone post or give references for the documented
"undocumented" instructions?  Someone else mentioned bit-string ops on
the 386.

Thanks in advance,
Alan Rooks	University of Waterloo		ajrooks@mansci1.uwaterloo.ca

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bx9A8o.I23@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watserv1!mansci1.UWaterloo.ca!ajrooks

References: <1992Nov04.155003.25751@apricot.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watserv1!mansci1.UWaterloo.ca!ajrooks
From: ajrooks@mansci1.UWaterloo.ca (Alan Rooks)
Subject: Re: LOADALL and the 486
Message-ID: <Bx9A8o.I23@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>
Sender: news@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca
Organization: University of Waterloo
References: <1992Nov04.155003.25751@apricot.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:33:59 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message