Re: Undocumented instructions in x86 CPUs

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #913

#913

From: Guy Harris
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 19:56

7 lines
722 bytes

> This instruction must be supported in future development.  Reason is
> that Borland uses this trick in it libraries.

I.e., the trick of using a radix other than 10 in AAM?

AAM with a radix of 10 should, presumably, be supported, given that it's
documented.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15404@auspex-gw.auspex.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy

References: <FH==sq#@engin.umich.edu> <15341@auspex-gw.auspex.com> <1992Nov09.162920.213@rz.uni-jena.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Undocumented instructions in x86 CPUs
Message-ID: <15404@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:56:38 GMT
References: <FH==sq#@engin.umich.edu> <15341@auspex-gw.auspex.com> <1992Nov09.162920.213@rz.uni-jena.de>
Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 7
Nntp-Posting-Host: auspex.auspex.com

Reply to Parent Message