🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #912

Re: Plural of Pentium (was Re: Why not INTEL586?)

#912
From: D. J. McCarthy
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 17:36
23 lines
1123 bytes
Rod Skinner (rskinner@mipos2.intel.com) wrote:
> dmccart@gomez.intel.com (D. J. McCarthy) writes:

\> 	One Pentium.  Two Pentiums.
\ 
\ There is only one way to describe the Pentium (tm) processor.  If you
\ want the plural form...it is Pentium processors.  ALL trademarks are
\ adjectives and therefore only have ONE form.
> 
/ Pentium (tm) CPUs
/ Pentium (tm) microprocessors
/ 
/ Rod Skinner				I speak for myself only.
/ Intel Corp

	Rod is right; I was wrong.  Pentium is indeed an adjective.
I stand corrected.


--
| D. J. McCarthy
| dmccart@gomez.intel.com
| ...!intelhf!mipos3!modl01!dmccart
Technical Details
Message-ID: <BxGM93.19u@inews.Intel.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!netsys!decwrl!hal.com!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!dmccart
References: <BxC3xv.6Kr@inews.Intel.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!netsys!decwrl!hal.com!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!dmccart
From: dmccart@gomez.intel.com (D. J. McCarthy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Plural of Pentium (was Re: Why not INTEL586?)
Message-ID: <BxGM93.19u@inews.Intel.COM>
Date: 9 Nov 92 17:36:38 GMT
References: <BxC3xv.6Kr@inews.Intel.COM>
Sender: news@inews.Intel.COM (USENET News System)
Organization: Intel ASTG, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 23
Nntp-Posting-Host: empyrea
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]