Re: MacWeek

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps

Article #11752

#11752

From: Jim McKay
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:03

8 lines
756 bytes

Adam.Frix@p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Adam Frix) writes:

>No, at $99/year, I think MacWEEK deserves a look-see.  True, it's for only 42
>issues (compared to 50 or so for its sister PCWeek).  But it's as full of

Plus PC WEEK is incredibly inaccurate.  I had to stop reading it
becuase it was misinformational not to mention aggravating.  MacWeek is
reasonably accurate.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C17rDI.6Ex@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!jjmckay

References: <1057310.2B5C1312@cmhgate.fidonet.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!jjmckay
From: jjmckay@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Jim McKay)
Subject: Re: MacWeek
Message-ID: <C17rDI.6Ex@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
References: <1057310.2B5C1312@cmhgate.fidonet.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:03:03 GMT
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message