Re: TouchBase vs. Dynodex

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps

Article #2231

#2231

From: Smittie
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 16:55

12 lines
1207 bytes

I have not used Dynodex. I do use TouchBASE and am really happy with it. The
sort routine is powerful and the print capabilities would accomodate your
requirements. TouchBASE is very powerful and it seems a natural add on for you
to get DateBook as well. It also accomodates printing for DayRunners and can
share data very cleanly and easily with TouchBASE. They're a really nice pair.

smittie
--
___________________________________________________________________________
GEnie, MCI, AOL:Smittie | If all of us were as smart as we think we are the
smittie@beach.csulb.edu |  current world problems would be yesterday's news.
________________________|___________________________________________________

Technical Details

Message-ID: <SMITTIE.92Aug17095458@lark.csulb.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!csus.edu!beach.csulb.edu!smittie

References: <a_6m36p.derek@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!csus.edu!beach.csulb.edu!smittie
From: smittie@beach.csulb.edu (Smittie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: TouchBase vs. Dynodex
Message-ID: <SMITTIE.92Aug17095458@lark.csulb.edu>
Date: 17 Aug 92 16:55:02 GMT
References: <a_6m36p.derek@netcom.com>
Sender: news@beach.csulb.edu (News Administration/Rumor Bureau)
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Lines: 12
In-Reply-To: derek@netcom.com's message of Fri, 14 Aug 92 02:06:19 GMT

Reply to Parent Message