🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4098@network.ucsd.edu> jon@weber.ucsd.edu (Jon Matousek) 
writes:
> I am interested in finding out what other folks on the net think? My 
intention
> is to inform, not to offend. If you consider my postings offensive, then 
tell
> me how I can continue to inform the folks who are interested in knowing 
more
> about Nisus.


Why don't you respond to them in private mail, like you did to me when I 
mentioned WordPerfect 2.0 a few weeks ago? But you can leave out the part 
where you implied that I had hidden reasons for having a prejudice against 
Paragon and/or Nisus and that I was using my dissatisfaction with your 
support for QUED/M as an "excuse" - for what, I'm still not sure.

I didn't mention any of this before since you responded in private mail 
but now that this thread is going on, I'd like to add my agreement that 
answering "Try Nisus" in response to questions about other products 
offends me, too, and would still be offensive even if you hadn't been such 
an obnoxious git to me in private mail.



David Gutierrez
drg@mdaali.cancer.utexas.edu

"Only fools are positive." - Moe Howard