Article View: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage
Article #159Zip Demand - Mac vs PC?
From: John Groves
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 1995 00:00
42 lines
3068 bytes
3068 bytes
Iomega's Zip Drive has become the hottest selling item of computer hardware to hit the market in years. I am researching information on the relative level of demand for Zip drives generated by Mac and PC users. Although Zip is available in both parallel and SCSI versions, the PC world does not seem anywhere near as excited by Zip as the Mac world. My hypothesis is that Mac users account for a disproportionately high share of the demand. If this is true, why is it so? � Does the average Mac user accumulate far more MB of files than the average PC user? Because of the Mac's huge superiority in ease of use and plug-and-play simplicity, I suspect that the average Mac user is encouraged to try many more software applications and to use them more frequently. The Mac's superiority in graphics applications would also encourage a far greater proportion of Mac users to operate graphics, video and sound applications, which generate huge file volumes. � Before Zip, Mac users probably were not able to buy external storage capacity as cheaply as PC users. Extra hard drive capacity seems to have been significantly cheaper for PC users, at least partly due to the wide range of IDE drives available for the PC. Mac users also do not have access to low cost tape backup systems, which are common for the PC. The lowest cost option for Mac users was probably SyQuest cartridge drives, which have been far too expensive for most home and SOHO users. SyQuest's reputation for poor drive and cartridge reliability has already been debated in these newsgroups Can anyone post anecdotal evidence on the relative level of Mac vs PC demand for Zip drives and disks? Perhaps this only emerges in terms of orders for SCSI vs parallel Zips, with the further complication of having to estimate the Mac vs PC split within the SCSI buyers. The split between Mac and PC formatted disks could also provide some indication, but end users are no doubt buying whatever disks they can find in the shops and reformating them if necessary. Let's hear what others think on these topics. -- John Groves NetSpace Online Systems, Melbourne, Australia jcgroves@netspace.net.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jcgroves-0707951549180001@203.12.52.32>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,818ed7ee0068dde6,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public X-Google-Thread: f64bf,818ed7ee0068dde6,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf64bf,public X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,818ed7ee0068dde6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public X-Google-Thread: 11002a,818ed7ee0068dde6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid11002a,public X-Google-Thread: 10b5e3,818ed7ee0068dde6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5e3,public From: jcgroves@netspace.net.au (John Groves) Subject: Zip Demand - Mac vs PC? Date: 1995/07/07 Message-ID: <jcgroves-0707951549180001@203.12.52.32> X-Deja-AN: 105725490 organization: NetSpace Online Systems reply-to: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,aus.computers.mac