Article View: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage
Article #160Re: Zip Demand - Mac vs PC?
From: - Marston Gould
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 1995 00:00
54 lines
3615 bytes
3615 bytes
In article <jcgroves-0707951549180001@203.12.52.32>, comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage wrote: > Iomega's Zip Drive has become the hottest selling item of computer > hardware to hit the market in years. I am researching information on the > relative level of demand for Zip drives generated by Mac and PC users. > Although Zip is available in both parallel and SCSI versions, the PC world > does not seem anywhere near as excited by Zip as the Mac world. My > hypothesis is that Mac users account for a disproportionately high share > of the demand. > > If this is true, why is it so? > > � Does the average Mac user accumulate far more MB of files than the > average PC user? Because of the Mac's huge superiority in ease of use and > plug-and-play simplicity, I suspect that the average Mac user is > encouraged to try many more software applications and to use them more > frequently. The Mac's superiority in graphics applications would also > encourage a far greater proportion of Mac users to operate graphics, video > and sound applications, which generate huge file volumes. > > � Before Zip, Mac users probably were not able to buy external storage > capacity as cheaply as PC users. Extra hard drive capacity seems to have > been significantly cheaper for PC users, at least partly due to the wide > range of IDE drives available for the PC. Mac users also do not have > access to low cost tape backup systems, which are common for the PC. The > lowest cost option for Mac users was probably SyQuest cartridge drives, > which have been far too expensive for most home and SOHO users. SyQuest's > reputation for poor drive and cartridge reliability has already been > debated in these newsgroups > > Can anyone post anecdotal evidence on the relative level of Mac vs PC > demand for Zip drives and disks? Perhaps this only emerges in terms of > orders for SCSI vs parallel Zips, with the further complication of having > to estimate the Mac vs PC split within the SCSI buyers. The split between > Mac and PC formatted disks could also provide some indication, but end > users are no doubt buying whatever disks they can find in the shops and > reformating them if necessary. > > Let's hear what others think on these topics. > > -- > John Groves > NetSpace Online Systems, Melbourne, Australia > jcgroves@netspace.net.au I remember reading in MacWeek that while Apple on represented 9-11%of the PC market the Mac represented 20-25% of the software market. This would go along with the idea that Mac users try out more software. Heck that's why I bought mine. -- Marston Gould m.j.gould@larc.nasa.gov Utilization Analysis Branch Advanced Space Concepts Division NASA Langley Research Center
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<--0707950923180001@mjgmac.larc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<jcgroves-0707951549180001@203.12.52.32>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 11002a,818ed7ee0068dde6 X-Google-Attributes: gid11002a,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,818ed7ee0068dde6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,818ed7ee0068dde6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public X-Google-Thread: f64bf,818ed7ee0068dde6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf64bf,public X-Google-Thread: 10b5e3,818ed7ee0068dde6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5e3,public From: - (Marston Gould) Subject: Re: Zip Demand - Mac vs PC? Date: 1995/07/07 Message-ID: <--0707950923180001@mjgmac.larc.nasa.gov> X-Deja-AN: 105820699 references: <jcgroves-0707951549180001@203.12.52.32> organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA USA newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,aus.computers.mac