Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Article #263Re: Total Chaos
From: JWBAXTER
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:11
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:11
29 lines
1670 bytes
1670 bytes
From: jwbaxter@halcyon.halcyon.com To: MACAPP3TECH$@applelink.apple.com John, Emulation isn't necessarily going to produce slow running of Mac OS applications on the new hardware. I've seen instances in the past in which such emulations on new hardware ran faster than the old machines did (NCR 315 emulated on the Criterion, as one example). In this case, we have a situation where a typical Mac OS application spends considerable time in the toolbox routines. The key ones of those can be (and, it is said, will be) recoded in native code, giving a boost. On top of that, the 68000 is an emulator, anyhow. The visible instruction set is emulated by the microcode. Shortly after the chip came out, both NCR and IBM took a long look at re-microcoding it to run their mainframe instruction sets (Criterion and 370). Both concluded that there wasn't quite enough silicon available (there was another problem...the microcode was a one-man show, he was gone, and the "source" was only slightly more organized than Woz's notes on the Apple ][ ROM). I don't know whether the 68020, 30, and 40 are also microcoded, or not. We won't know whether Mac OS running on the new machines is bad or not until we see it. -------------- John W. Baxter jwbaxter@halcyon.com [BAXTER.JOHN on AppleLink, from AppleLink only.]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199301110807.AA24943@halcyon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com From: JWBAXTER@HALCYON.HALCYON.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3 Subject: Re: Total Chaos Message-ID: <199301110807.AA24943@halcyon.com> Date: 11 Jan 93 08:11:00 GMT Sender: daemon@Apple.COM Organization: AppleLink Gateway Lines: 29