🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4er2af$nna@newsroom.hitc.com>, psand@eos.hitc.com (G. Patrick
Sand) wrote:

>>template <class OBJECT>
>>class Test {
>>   // (a) This is what I want but it won't compile in CodeWarrior 8:
>>   //typedef void (OBJECT::*ObjectMemberFunction)(void); 
>>
>>   // (b) This works but isn't what I want:
>>   typedef void (ATest::*ObjectMemberFunction)(void); 
>>   
>[snip!]
>>};     
>
>I think the answer is NO.  A template is a cookie cutter for whatever you 
>specify, but it doesn't assume any knowledge about what you specify 
>beyond whether it is a class template or a function template.


I'm not asking it to. I just want it to substitute the real class name for
OBJECT in:

  typedef void (OBJECT::*ObjectMemberFunction)(void);

just as it does with all other references to OBJECT within the template.


VisualC++ 4.0 does this successfully, by the way.

-- 
rs/rshapiro@bbn.com