Re: Mac vs. Amiga (sorry)

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #14250

#14250

From: 6111231
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1987 04:24

17 lines
1273 bytes

In article <76000003@uiucdcsp>, ericson@uiucdcsp.cs.uiuc.edu  writes:

>
>Just a quick question for you Amiga multi-taksers:
>
>How can you ensure safe multi-tasking with out an MMU?

>It would seem that any program could write abitrarily into any
>other program's memory - thus causing obvious problems.

Even if this information is for comparison with the Macintosh, my
netnews software says (because I don't read comp.sys.amiga) that this
was ONLY posted to comp.sys.mac. Does this make a lot of sense to YOU?
Hmmmmm....

Peter Wisnovsky
Virtual Address:         UUCP: ...ihnp4!psuvax1!6111231@pucc.bitnet

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1654@PUCC.BITNET>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!princeton!puvax2!6111231@PUCC.BITNET

References: <76000003@uiucdcsp> <1279@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!princeton!puvax2!6111231@PUCC.BITNET
From: 6111231@PUCC.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Mac vs. Amiga (sorry)
Message-ID: <1654@PUCC.BITNET>
Date: Wed, 28-Jan-87 23:24:06 EST
Article-I.D.: PUCC.1654
Posted: Wed Jan 28 23:24:06 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Jan-87 06:47:57 EST
References: <76000003@uiucdcsp> <1279@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: 6111231@PUCC.BITNET
Organization: Princeton University - Computing and Information Technology
Lines: 17
Disclaimer: Author bears full responsibility for contents of this article

Reply to Parent Message