Re: WARNING--512K UPGRADE!!!

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #16471

#16471

From: mbrookov
Date: Sun, 31 May 1987 01:44

15 lines
1180 bytes

  There has been a great deal of discussion about who should guarantee a 
Macintiosh with a non Apple memory upgarade.  For some reason people 
think Apple or the dealer should be responsible for other compaines 
hardware, which could consivably (sp?) damage or not work with rom/800K
drive upgrades.
  Why doesent the company that manufactured the upgrade guarantee the
Macintosh and any future upgrdes.  If they refuse to, why would anybody
want to buy their product.
  


                        Matt Brookover

these are my opinions, I am not affiliated whith any bodss

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3739@udenva.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!hao!nbires!isis!udenva!mbrookov

References: <MS.V3.18.cl1x.80022e03.dorrance.ibm032.1842.0@andrew.cmu.edu> <7396@elsie.UUCP> <2960@well.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!hao!nbires!isis!udenva!mbrookov
From: mbrookov@udenva.UUCP (mbrookov)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: WARNING--512K UPGRADE!!!
Message-ID: <3739@udenva.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 30-May-87 21:44:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: udenva.3739
Posted: Sat May 30 21:44:06 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Jun-87 01:48:37 EDT
References: <MS.V3.18.cl1x.80022e03.dorrance.ibm032.1842.0@andrew.cmu.edu> <7396@elsie.UUCP> <2960@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: mbrookov@udenva.UUCP ()
Organization: U of Denver
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message