Re: AztecC 1.06i warning

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #17905

#17905

From: Bradford Needham
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1987 17:51

11 lines
1048 bytes

As an SE owner, I gave up on Aztec C when I found it wouldn't work under
system 4.1.  It was the last straw in a pile of minor incompatibilities.
It seemed to me that Manx hadn't put any support into Aztec C for over
a year, so I switched to a less-expensive, better-supported, more-productive
compiler -- Lightspeed C.

Now that I've used LSC for a while, I don't know why I didn't make the
switch earlier!

Brad Needham
bradn@tekig4.TEK.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1765@tekig4.TEK.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig!tekig4!bradn

References: <2770@crcge1.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekig!tekig4!bradn
From: bradn@tekig4.TEK.COM (Bradford Needham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: AztecC 1.06i warning
Message-ID: <1765@tekig4.TEK.COM>
Date: Thu, 6-Aug-87 13:51:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekig4.1765
Posted: Thu Aug  6 13:51:14 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 15:04:25 EDT
References: <2770@crcge1.UUCP>
Reply-To: bradn@tekig4.UUCP (Bradford Needham)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
Lines: 11
Summary: I switched to LSC

Reply to Parent Message