Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #18034Re: Mac C Compilers, Benchmarks, Stupidity
From: William T. Douglass
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1987 01:57
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1987 01:57
12 lines
1252 bytes
1252 bytes
In article <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV> dsc@izimbra.CSS.GOV (David S. Comay) writes: >the one thing i remember from the byte article is that the binaries >they used on the mac // were the same ones they used on the mac plus. >namely, they contained strictly 68000 instructions. I thought that the compiled code used in the BYTE benchmark came from a Mac SE with a HyperCharger 68020 board, 16 MHz chip with a 7.83 MHz 68881 co-processor. Seems that the code generated would be the same for both machines. Anyone able to clarify this point? Bill Douglass ayac071@ngp.UUCP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5884@ut-ngp.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!ut-ngp!ayac071References:
<3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!ut-ngp!ayac071 From: ayac071@ut-ngp.UUCP (William T. Douglass) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Mac C Compilers, Benchmarks, Stupidity Message-ID: <5884@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: Tue, 11-Aug-87 21:57:58 EDT Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.5884 Posted: Tue Aug 11 21:57:58 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 13-Aug-87 07:10:09 EDT References: <3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV> Reply-To: ayac071@ngp.UUCP (Bill Douglass) Distribution: world Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 12 Keywords: 68000 68020 80386 mac ps/2 apple ibm byte benchmark