🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #25334

Re: Bug in LaserWriter Driver 5.0

#25334
From: Bayles Holt
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1988 18:59
40 lines
2556 bytes
In Article 13801 Edward Moy writes:
>I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but has anyone noticed that
>LW 5.0 doesn't create the Chicago font correctly, either when downloading
>to the LaserWriter or when creating a PostScript file.  The glyphs for the
>characters 17-20 (command, check mark, diamond and apple) are missing, so
>these symbols don't appear in the final output.  I checked LW 4.0 and it
>properly creates these glyphs.
 
I tried to duplicate the problems you mention in version 5.0 without success.
Perhaps you could forward specific info about how to duplicate the problem
such as the document, font size, and application you were using.

As a initial guess to such behavior I might offer the following explanation
and you can judge as to its applicability.  Some of the early bitmap fonts
were created with different characters in different point sizes.
That is, Chicago 12 point might contain the "missing" characters
while Chicago 18 point (or some other size) might not.  When
a document with 12 point Chicago is printed, the LaserWriter driver selects
the 18 point font to print (because it prints better at the higher resolution)
and ends up without the characters in question.  The practice of putting
different characters in different point sizes is discouraged, but you can
check this out very easily, just see if you have more than one point size of
Chicago in your font menu.

>On the subject of bugs, both 4.0 and 5.0 won't print italicized Chicago either.
>The 3.x series worked fine.
 
The Italic style variation also seemed to work fine for me.  Again by way of
explanation, the original LaserWriter contained a bug in PostScript where
italicizing a bitmap object such as a font character did not work when the
character being rendered was exactly the right size for printing and did 
not require scaling.  Again this is easy to test just by setting the point
size to some other size and see if the problem goes away.

Otherwise...  If there are additional comments or questions, you may
reply to me directly.

--Bayles Holt
holt@apple.UUCP
APPLELINK: HOLT2
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7403@apple.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!decvax!ucbvax!hplabs!pyramid!voder!apple!holt
References: <6975@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!decvax!ucbvax!hplabs!pyramid!voder!apple!holt
From: holt@apple.UUCP (Bayles Holt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Bug in LaserWriter Driver 5.0
Message-ID: <7403@apple.UUCP>
Date: 15 Feb 88 18:59:02 GMT
References: <6975@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: holt@apple.UUCP (Bayles Holt)
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, USA
Lines: 40