Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #26691Re: CMS Pro80II/i vs. Pro102k-II/i Disks
From: Robert K. Shull
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1988 18:31
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1988 18:31
15 lines
1191 bytes
1191 bytes
In article <987@aucs.UUCP> peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) writes: (about the CMS drive) >speed, is there anything else that makes the 102M drive "inferior" to >their 80M drive. Its tempting to get, but if its noisy or has some Three of us here have the CMS 102 internal. Unfortunately, we haven't received our Mac II's yet so I can't tell you how the drive runs. I can tell you though that the drive is a half-height made by Rodime. (Someone else will have to tell you whether that's good or bad, and I don't know who makes their 80 meg drive) Robert -- Robert K. Shull University of Oklahoma, Engineering Computer Network ihnp4!occrsh!uokmax!rob CIS 73765,1254 Delphi RKSHULL Opinions contained herein in no way reflect those of the University of Oklahoma.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1131@uokmax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!att-ih!occrsh!uokmax!robReferences:
<987@aucs.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!att-ih!occrsh!uokmax!rob From: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K. Shull) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: CMS Pro80II/i vs. Pro102k-II/i Disks Message-ID: <1131@uokmax.UUCP> Date: 23 Mar 88 18:31:03 GMT References: <987@aucs.UUCP> Reply-To: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K. Shull) Distribution: na Organization: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK Lines: 15