Re: My disillusioned self.

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #38759

#38759

From: Wayne Folta
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 1989 18:10

14 lines
1208 bytes

Whether you call IBM graphics slow in comparison to the Mac may depend on
whether you are talking MS Windows or not.  I know that PageMaker 2.0
on the Mac BLEW AWAY PageMaker 1.0 on an IBM AT.  Isn't the AT, with its
286, a generation ahead of the SE with its 68000?  But doing a zoom
on the Mac was always 3 or 4 times faster than the AT.

I have heard that the problem is not necessarily the IBM, but is probably
MS Windows, which is--I hear--notoriously slow.  Just watching the screen
manipulations of QuickDraw versus Windows has convinced me that QuickDraw
is much smarter about how and what to redraw, etc..


Wayne Folta          (folta@tove.umd.edu  128.8.128.42)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <16217@mimsy.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!mimsy!tove.umd.edu!folta

References: <235@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> <46100288@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!mimsy!tove.umd.edu!folta
From: folta@tove.umd.edu (Wayne Folta)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: My disillusioned self.
Summary: Windows software is extremely slow
Message-ID: <16217@mimsy.UUCP>
Date: 4 Mar 89 18:10:33 GMT
References: <235@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> <46100288@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: nobody@mimsy.UUCP
Reply-To: folta@tove.umd.edu.UUCP (Wayne Folta)
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, gs
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message