Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #39001Re: SuperPaint 2.0 impressions...
From: Steve Goldfield
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 16:08
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 16:08
22 lines
1232 bytes
1232 bytes
In article <9799@ihlpb.ATT.COM> hardy@ihlpb.ATT.COM (Hardy) writes: #> #>Can anyone tell me how big SuperPaint 2.0 is compared to 1.0? When I #>upgraded to MacWrite 5.0, I was shocked to see that it had grown from #>70K to 170K! (As if things weren't ALREADY getting tight on my floppies.) #>I'd like to know if I would have a similar problem with SuperPaint 2.0. #>My impression is that this would NOT be an appropriate program to use #>on a 512KE. #> #>thanks -- mark SuperPaint 2.0 is 516,017 bytes. SuperPaint 1.0 was 165,034 bytes. However, the suggested memory size has increased from 582K to 700K. So, yes, if you are using floppies, you'll have to dedicate one to SuperPaint 2.0, unless you have one of the new 1.6M drives. Steve Goldfield
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!steveReferences:
<5952@bsu-cs.UUCP> <9799@ihlpb.ATT.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!steve From: steve@violet.berkeley.edu (Steve Goldfield) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: SuperPaint 2.0 impressions... Message-ID: <21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 9 Mar 89 16:08:33 GMT References: <5952@bsu-cs.UUCP> <9799@ihlpb.ATT.COM> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 22