Re: IIcx intro (Mac II dead?)

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #39002

#39002

From: Wayne Mesard
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 15:38

16 lines
1094 bytes

In article <3794@emory.mathcs.emory.edu> phssra@emory.UUCP (Scott Robert Anderson) writes:
>In article <QY5TLHy00WBVM34Hga@andrew.cmu.edu> wb1j+@andrew.cmu.edu (William M. Bumgarner) writes:
>>A Thought:  What is the point of the Mac II?
>>Did Apple just kill that Mac II?  If so, does it really matter?
>
>I believe they did.

Not if you're gonna need, e.g. a MacIvory system with tons o' memory.
It's my understanding that the IIcx has 3 card slots vs. the II's 6.
I'm working on two projects now where we'll be installing more than 3
cards.

-- 
unsigned *Wayne_Mesard();
MESARD@BBN.COM
BBN, Cambridge, MA

Technical Details

Message-ID: <37023@bbn.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!oliveb!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mesard

References: <QY5TLHy00WBVM34Hga@andrew.cmu.edu> <3794@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!oliveb!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mesard
From: mesard@bbn.com (Wayne Mesard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: IIcx intro (Mac II dead?)
Message-ID: <37023@bbn.COM>
Date: 9 Mar 89 15:38:25 GMT
References: <QY5TLHy00WBVM34Hga@andrew.cmu.edu> <3794@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>
Sender: news@bbn.COM
Reply-To: mesard@BBN.COM (Wayne Mesard)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message