Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #39015Re: Shouldn't StuffIt implement atob/btoa?
From: Ace Swerling
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 18:03
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 18:03
12 lines
991 bytes
991 bytes
In article <604@tekno.chalmers.se> d83_sven_a@tekno.chalmers.se (Sven (Sciz) Axelsson) writes: >Well, mr. Lau, why not go all the way and implementing the atob/btoa protocol >in the next release of StuffIt? I, for one wouldn't mind getting my telephone >bill cut by having less data to transfer through the modem. Hear, hear! I think that BinHex exacts too much of a cost in size for what it does, especially when there's another alternative out there that can significantly cut data size. -Ace This is only my opinion.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41ec8cdc.129dc@blue.engin.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!swerlingReferences:
<604@tekno.chalmers.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!swerling From: swerling@caen.engin.umich.edu (Ace Swerling) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Shouldn't StuffIt implement atob/btoa? Message-ID: <41ec8cdc.129dc@blue.engin.umich.edu> Date: 9 Mar 89 18:03:00 GMT References: <604@tekno.chalmers.se> Reply-To: swerling@caen.engin.umich.edu (Ace Swerling) Organization: University of Michigan Engineering Lines: 12