Re: Low-Cost Macintosh

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #45472

#45472

From: Pablo Fernicola
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1990 18:19

22 lines
1547 bytes

In article <6457@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> goldader@uhccux.UUCP (Jeff Goldader) 
<25c8e25c.62bb@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> rcfische@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Raymond C. Fischer) <126900165@p.cs.uiuc.edu> gillies@p.cs.uiuc.edu 

>>>MacWorld last week said that the low-cost macintosh will have the same
>>>8Mhz 68000 as the original Mac 128k.  It will have enhanced ROMs
>>>(compared to the SE).
>>>

STOP THIS NONSENSE!  JUST LOWER THE PRICE ON THE SE!!!!!

Why, Why spend money developing a new product (manuals, packaging,
case, advertising) when there is something already there that fulfills
the needs?

It would be more useful to develop new and better things.

Sorry, this stupid behavior just gets me irritated. :-)
--
pff@beach.cis.ufl.edu - Pablo Fernicola - Machine Intelligence Laboratory - UF
		IF YOU CARE ENOUGH TO READ SIGNATURES ...
	I am graduating Spring 1990 and I am looking for a job.  
	MS EE, my graduate work incorporates OO-DBMS/Graphics/Robotics/AI

Technical Details

Message-ID: <22057@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!beach.cis.ufl.edu!pff

References: <126900165@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <25c8e25c.62bb@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <6457@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!beach.cis.ufl.edu!pff
From: pff@beach.cis.ufl.edu (Pablo Fernicola)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Low-Cost Macintosh
Message-ID: <22057@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Date: 2 Feb 90 18:19:53 GMT
References: <126900165@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <25c8e25c.62bb@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <6457@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>
Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU
Reply-To: pff@beach.cis.ufl.edu ()
Distribution: na
Organization: UF CIS Department
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message