Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #8442Gatorbox vs. Fastpath 4: which is better?
From: Willard Korfhage
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1989 21:50
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1989 21:50
8 lines
903 bytes
903 bytes
It appears that the Gatorbox has a faster processor, more memory, and
more functionality (e.g. NFS) than a Fastpath at only slightly greater
cost. Is there any reason we should buy a Fastpath rather than a Gatorbox?
Willard Korfhage ARPA : korfhage@pucatt.poly.edu, korfhage@cs.ucla.edu
UUCP : {ucbvax,randvax,trwrb!trwspp,ism780}!ucla-cs!korfhage
"Castro Kicks Vanna Habit: Tough-talking tyrant vows he'll never watch
'Wheel of Fortune' again!" - Weekly World News
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!korfhageShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!korfhage From: korfhage@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Willard Korfhage) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Gatorbox vs. Fastpath 4: which is better? Message-ID: <29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Date: 27 Nov 89 21:50:09 GMT Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU Reply-To: korfhage@pucatt.poly.edu (Willard Korfhage) Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 8