Re: Gatorbox vs. Fastpath 4: which is better?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #8443

#8443

From: Herb Poppe
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1989 22:18

13 lines
1281 bytes

In article <29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> korfhage@pucatt.poly.edu (Willard Korfhage) writes:
>It appears that the Gatorbox has a faster processor, more memory, and
>more functionality (e.g. NFS) than a Fastpath at only slightly greater
>cost. Is there any reason we should buy a Fastpath rather than a Gatorbox?

The software that implements the AppleShare - NFS function has been
unbundled (as of this summer sometime). I suspect the prices you
are comparing do not include the cost of this software. I don't have
a recent price list in front of me; I recall it to be about $1800.

Herb Poppe      NCAR                         INTERNET: hpoppe@ncar.ucar.edu
(303) 497-1296  P.O. Box 3000                   CSNET: hpoppe@ncar.CSNET
		Boulder, CO  80307               UUCP: hpoppe@ncar.UUCP

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5456@ncar.ucar.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!ames!ncar!bierstadt!hpoppe

References: <29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!ames!ncar!bierstadt!hpoppe
From: hpoppe@bierstadt.ucar.edu (Herb Poppe)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Gatorbox vs. Fastpath 4: which is better?
Message-ID: <5456@ncar.ucar.edu>
Date: 27 Nov 89 22:18:42 GMT
References: <29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Sender: news@ncar.ucar.edu
Reply-To: hpoppe@bierstadt.UCAR.EDU (Herb Poppe)
Organization: Scientific Computing Division/NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message