Re: 74LS is too slow. Maybe?

Article View: comp.sys.misc

Article #647

#647

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1991 17:00

12 lines
1149 bytes

In article <1991Apr23.013116.3769@nntp-server.caltech.edu>, josephc@nntp-server.caltech.edu (Simplelogic (Joseph)) writes:
> My problem is that a couple of 74LS gates will already add up to about 40ns
> to the access time...  Ergo, wait states - something that I don't want...

The original article of this hasn't wandered into zoo yet -- either we've
got a propagation glitch or it had illegal headers and never made it --
but insofar as I understand the problem out of context, have you considered
a faster TTL family like 74F?  74F is probably going to be less hassle
than getting something like a PAL blown.
-- 
And the bean-counter replied,           | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
"beans are more important".             |  henry@zoo.toronto.edu  utzoo!henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Apr26.170037.1542@zoo.toronto.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <1991Apr23.013116.3769@nntp-server.caltech.edu> <1067@eplunix.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc,sci.engr,sci.electronics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: 74LS is too slow. Maybe?
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.170037.1542@zoo.toronto.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1991 17:00:37 GMT
References: <1991Apr23.013116.3769@nntp-server.caltech.edu> <1067@eplunix.UUCP>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology

Reply to Parent Message