Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2090Re: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft)
From: David Pollak
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:28
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:28
58 lines
2924 bytes
2924 bytes
In article <716108512.F00004@blkcat.UUCP> David.Gursky@p394.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (David Gursky) writes: > I posted: > > DG> I'll throw my two cents in to this debate. The one thing missing from > DG> everyone's spreadsheet application is compatibility with Excel... > > And Clifford T. Matthews (ctm@ardi.com) responded: > > CM> Excel 3.0a for the Macintosh runs under Executor 1.2 (shipping today). > CM> Excel 4.0 for the Macintosh runs under Executor 1.2.1 (shipping > CM> sometime next week, assuming we get the manuals back from the > CM> printer). > > Clifford's response misses my point. I know I can use Executor to run Excel, > but if a user can run Excel, they will not switch to Athena Design's Mesa, > Appsoft's Solution, Lotus' Improv, or Informix's Wingz. Athena Design, Appsoft, > Lotus, and Informix all realize that backwards compatibility to competiting > products is an effective method of winning new sales, because the user will not > loose access to any of the information they have generated. All I'm saying is > that the specific set of formats supported needs to be expanded to include Excel > (both Mac and PC versions.) I think that Executor is a fine product and a cool concept, but I do not view it as a long term solution. It is a way of bridging the software gap that still exists on the NeXT. There is no good word processor (I think that MS Word 4.0 is *GREAT*) on the NeXT. I was holding my breath for Pages and PasteUp, but I'd now place even money that Appsoft Write! will be out before either of the other two products (I wonder if the folks at Appsoft will trade a copy of Write! for a copy of Mesa :-)) Nevertheless, Executor will never offer what I bought my NeXT for: NeXTSTEP applications that are cool, interoperate (i.e., distributed objects), and look and feel right. The Mac is almost 10 year old technology and looks it. NeXTSTEP is the leading technology and I want my NeXTSTEP applications. I'm hoping to make Mesa so cool that people will go "how did I ever use anything as clunky as Excel?" like they are now saying "How did I ever use anything as clucky as 1-2-3?" after seeing Mesa. Cliff is doing a great service to the community, but if I simply wanted to run Mac applications, I'd go out and by a Quadra. David -- David Pollak - dpp@athena.com - NeXTMail Compliant Attorney at Law, Feeder of the Bears, Athena Design, Inc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep11.132802.8985@dpp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!dpp!dppReferences:
<716108512.F00004@blkcat.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!dpp!dpp From: dpp@athena.com (David Pollak) Subject: Re: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft) Message-ID: <1992Sep11.132802.8985@dpp> Sender: dpp@dpp Reply-To: dpp@athena.com (David Pollak) Organization: Athena Design, Inc. References: <716108512.F00004@blkcat.UUCP> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:28:02 GMT Lines: 58