Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2091Re: A NEW tar&compress FRONTEND....
From: John Soward
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 16:08
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 16:08
48 lines
2671 bytes
2671 bytes
Greg Cockroft writes
-> In article <1992Aug13.215318.530@ms.uky.edu> soward@slow.inslab.uky.edu
-> (John Soward) writes:
-> > Glenn Reid writes
-> > -> the compressed data. Just yesterday I got a 10-to-1 compression
-> > -> on a directory full of TIFF files, and I thought that TIFF already
-> > -> had reasonably good compression in its internal format!
-> >
-> > No actually it sucks (e.g it has none)...unless you are using one
-> of
-> > NeXTs TIFF compression schemes...which are lempel-ziv (same as compress)
-> or
-> > JPEG (radically diferrent and results in a huge compression, but is
-> "lossy" --
-> > which sometimes is a big deal and sometimes is not).
-> > --
->
-> This is incorrect information.
I do not think so...better read again for content.
-> TIFF 5.0 has optional compression of various types.
^^^^^^^^
This is the key....
-> LZW -- same as in compress. Previous substrings in a lookup table.
-> packbits -- run length encoding
-> group 4? fax compression. -- Various bit strings representing runs of
-> 0 and 1 bits. Some interline deltas.
->
-> NXImageBitImageRep supports LZW and packbits.
->
-> The JPEG data in 2.x TIFF files is a non-standard extension because it had
-> not yet been addressed in TIFF when 2.0 shipped. JPEG will be part of TIFF
-> 6.0. 3.0 NeXTStep is supposed to conform to TIFF 6.0.
This is, however, claimed in the 3.0pr2 docs.
->
-> For the most part LZW and packbits do very well on non-continous tone
-> images. Maybe not state of the art but certainly some big savings.
In real-world usage, packbits seems to perform poorly, but lzw does
okay--but not really much better than using compress (also lempel-ziv) on the
tiff file (but then you have to actually issue uncompress to open it ;-)
--
________________________________________________________________________
/ 'The midnight sun will burn you up" -The Cure, Piggy in the Mirror /
/ soward@ms.uky.edu | soward@slow.inslab.uky.edu (NeXT Mail) /
/_______________________________________________________________________/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug24.160817.2595@ms.uky.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!ukma!newsReferences:
<1992Aug17.170230.4109@agog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!ukma!news From: soward@slow.inslab.uky.edu (John Soward) Subject: Re: A NEW tar&compress FRONTEND.... References: <1992Aug17.170230.4109@agog.com> Nntp-Posting-Host: slow.inslab.uky.edu Message-ID: <1992Aug24.160817.2595@ms.uky.edu> Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences Sender: news@ms.uky.edu (USENET News System) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 16:08:17 GMT Lines: 48