🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3729

Re: Considering getting an SGI indigo

#3729
From: Rubricant Horticulturist
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 19:58
37 lines
2419 bytes
In article <1992Oct4.163636.12643@u.washington.edu> tzs@stein.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) writes:
>jhenshaw@microsoft.com (Jeff Henshaw) writes:
>>In article 2043 of comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,
>>| use at home, which rules out NeXT.  NeXT (at least, the ones that they
>>| sell here at UW) only are FCC certified for office use.
>>
>>To the best of my knowledge, the *entire* NeXT product
>>line is FCC certified as FCC class 'A.'
>>I have several friends who have purchased, quite legally,
>>NeXT boxes from the UW campus store for home use.  The
>
>Class 'B' is what is required for home use, isn't it?  Anyway, there is a
>sign right above the NeXT on display at the UW store that says that they
>aren't to be used at home due to lack of FCC class 'B' certification.
>
>--Tim Smith

This "sign" at the University (of Washington) bookstore has been
placed there fairly recently.  We were the first people to buy a NeXT
through them and that certainly was never mentioned (yes, we have it
at home).  So we asked a bookstore employee about it and he said that
NeXT was in the process of getting its certification for home use.
Also, the sign was placed there because of complaints from competitors
who want the U Bookstores student customers or something.  No, these
competitors wouldn't give the educational discount.  Not that the
University Bookstore gives you the best discount.  So, in a nutshell,
I was told to ignore the sign as it was there to placate the
opposition.

And we've never had a problem with electronic interference from our
NeXT.  From our z19 on the other hand...

-- 
Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush, Vice Grip
Abstract Software             
e-mail: begonia@abstractsoft.com        NeXTmail accepted with glee
"Another one of the flock following the herd."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Oct4.195847.18770@u.washington.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!hardy.u.washington.edu!begonia
References: <1992Oct04.085731.4924@microsoft.com> <1992Oct4.163636.12643@u.washington.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!hardy.u.washington.edu!begonia
From: begonia@hardy.u.washington.edu (Rubricant Horticulturist)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re: Considering getting an SGI indigo
Message-ID: <1992Oct4.195847.18770@u.washington.edu>
Date: 4 Oct 92 19:58:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct4.195847.18770
References: <1992Oct04.085731.4924@microsoft.com> <1992Oct4.163636.12643@u.washington.edu>
Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 37