Re: Is DOTS needed when using 3.0?

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #3832

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#3832

From: Reimer A. Mellin
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 21:17

26 lines
1371 bytes

Tony Richardson writes
> I recall seeing something about 3.0 having support built-in (ala djf, DOTS,
> etc.) for non-NeXT, non-PostScript printers.  Is this true?  If not, do
> djf and DOTS work with 3.0.  I'm considering upgrading, but don't want
> to lose the ability to use my DeskJet.

djf ist usable on 3.0. either get the file
	djf_for_3.0.tar.Z from sonata.cc.purdue.edu in /pub/next/submissions
or
        the same file from ftp.informatik.uni-muenchen.de in  
/pub/next/Utils/printer

Another way is just to recompile djf on 3.0 while getting the file
/usr/include/sys/table.h from a 2.1 System. This file was split for
3.0 but one part was miraculously forgotten.

cheers
	Reimer

--
Reimer A. Mellin, ram@ramsys.sta.sub.org
Aidenbachstr. 131/6, 8000 Muenchen 71,
+ 49 89 79849411
-- 
Reimer A. Mellin, ram@ramsys.sta.sub.org
Aidenbachstr. 131/6, 8000 Muenchen 71,

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov15.211707.1287@ramsys.sta.sub.org>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!seven-up.East.Sun.COM!sungy!stasys!ramsys.sta.sub.org!ram

References: <1992Nov13.203949.4310@chiton.ucsd.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!seven-up.East.Sun.COM!sungy!stasys!ramsys.sta.sub.org!ram
From: ram@ramsys (Reimer A. Mellin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re: Is DOTS needed when using 3.0?
Message-ID: <1992Nov15.211707.1287@ramsys.sta.sub.org>
Date: 15 Nov 92 21:17:07 GMT
References: <1992Nov13.203949.4310@chiton.ucsd.edu>
Sender: uucp@stasys.sta.sub.org
Organization: at home
Lines: 26

Reply to Parent Message