Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3865Re: named pipes
From: Zenon Fortuna
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:11
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:11
20 lines
1102 bytes
1102 bytes
In article <BxtopF.EMM.2@cs.cmu.edu> ddj+@cs.cmu.edu (Doug DeJulio) writes: > >I just wanted to let people know, I've tried using named pipes under >3.0 and they work! Yet another reason to upgrade from 2.X. So, if >memory serves, here's the status of named pipes under the NeXT version >of Mach: > >1.0 and earlier -- it works >2.0, 2.1, 2.2 -- causes system panic if you try to use them >3.0 -- it works > >-- >Doug DeJulio >ddj+@cmu.edu Seems that you are very right. One cannot use the "/etc/mknod" to create the FIFO, but the "mknod(2)" works (e.g. mknod(fileName,010644,0)). Bad that the documentation does not say a word about this fix. -Z.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov16.231110.12439@resonex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!netcomsv!resonex!zenonReferences:
<BxtopF.EMM.2@cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!netcomsv!resonex!zenon From: zenon@resonex.com (Zenon Fortuna) Subject: Re: named pipes Message-ID: <1992Nov16.231110.12439@resonex.com> Organization: Resonex Inc., Sunnyvale CA References: <BxtopF.EMM.2@cs.cmu.edu> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:11:10 GMT Lines: 20