🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Nov13.234309.10755@selway.umt.edu> cs000rdw@selway.umt.edu  
(Richard D Warner) writes:
> 
> 	I'm a developer who just wants to get a product out the door, and
> I'm frustrated about having to learn a new language just to interface  
with
> IB.  I know you're supposed to be able to insert ANSI or C++ code into  
IB
> but I haven't been able to yet.  You still need to know what's going on
> with the implementation files (in Objective-C).  It's supposed to
> be "easier", but easier than what???  Why doesn't NeXT come up with a 
> version of IB written for C++?  
> 
> 
> Rich

When I was learning IB that was the same question I had.  I did not answer  
it until I learned Objective-C and reading an article in "The Journal of  
OOP" magazine and the article is "Why I need Objective-C?".  That's  
probably going to answer all your whys.  I understand you perfectly since  
I asked myself the same question, but take the time to learn Objective-C  
you'll love it.

I love Objective-C, it's easy, simple, powerful and what's most important:  
"Thanks to Objective-C we have IB and Distributed Objects so nicely  
integrated into Objective-C.  Not possible with C++.

--
Ricardo J. Parada