Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4076Re: ksh
From: Andy Newman
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 05:14
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 05:14
26 lines
1339 bytes
1339 bytes
isbell@cats.ucsc.edu (Art Isbell) writes: > >Have you possibly neglected to strip bash? > >259[~]% ls -l /usr/local/bin/bash /bin/sh >-rwxr-xr-x 2 root 122880 Jul 21 06:16 /bin/sh* >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 221184 Oct 5 11:28 /usr/local/bin/bash* >260[~]% bash -version >bash -version >GNU bash, version 1.12.1 I'm talking about incore memory use. An ls is not a good indicator of code/data size anyway, there's lots of junk in Mach-O executable files. Try size instead... $ size /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/bash __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 114688 24576 0 8192 147456 24000 /bin/sh 245760 16384 0 8192 270336 42000 /usr/local/bin/bash $ (This method has it own problem as it is measuring static code size and not the working set of the acutal executable.) -- Andy Newman (andy@research.canon.oz.au)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BznAJD.6uC@research.canon.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andyReferences:
<FISCHER.92Dec12191250@solsort.iesd.auc.dk> <Bz9voD.AF@research.canon.oz.au> <1gomlsINNmot@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andy From: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman) Subject: Re: ksh Message-ID: <BznAJD.6uC@research.canon.oz.au> Sender: news@research.canon.oz.au Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia References: <FISCHER.92Dec12191250@solsort.iesd.auc.dk> <Bz9voD.AF@research.canon.oz.au> <1gomlsINNmot@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 05:14:00 GMT Lines: 26