Re: No FrameMaker 4.0 for NeXT?

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #4247

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#4247

From: Chuck Waltrip
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:30

25 lines
1276 bytes

In article <Dec10.153847.46125@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>  
randall@redfish.atmos.colostate.edu (Dave Randall) writes:
> In article <1992Dec10.131915.27684@glv.uucp> jcelam@confused (James  
Clifton  
> Elam) writes:
> > In article <1992Dec10.091630.17938@fokus.gmd.de>  
kho@hubble.fokus.gmd.de  
> (Klaus  
> > Hofrichter) writes:
> > > 
> > > But the real bad thing: The distributor told me that there will be  
NO  
> > > FrameMaker 4.0 port for NeXT. Can someone confirm this? 
> > > 
> > 
> This would be an absolute disaster for me. Can someone at Frame and / or  
NeXT  
> straighten this out quickly? Is Frame dropping support for NeXT or not?

	We'd find this pretty disturbing as well.  We have Frame on 	 
	several platforms but people queue up to use it on the NeXT.

c.f.waltrip
Opinions expressed are my own.
Email:	<chuck@nighthawk.jhuapl.edu>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bz3y23.K97@netnews.jhuapl.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!usenet

References: <Dec10.153847.46125@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!usenet
From: chuck@nighthawk.jhuapl.edu (Chuck Waltrip)
Subject: Re: No FrameMaker 4.0 for NeXT?
Message-ID: <Bz3y23.K97@netnews.jhuapl.edu>
Sender: usenet@netnews.jhuapl.edu
Organization: JHU/Applied Physics Laboratory
References: <Dec10.153847.46125@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:30:02 GMT
Lines: 25

Reply to Parent Message